← Back
LLMsNEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna: The Price Is the Same Now. Here Is What Differs

On October 7, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 output, 90% below Haiku 4.5 and the same as GPT-6 Luna, for prompts under 100,000 tokens. Above that line the price is five times higher. Here is what it costs in practice, where it beats Luna, and what to watch before you switch.

4 min read
Updated Oct 8, 2026
QUICK ANSWER

On October 7, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, its new small model, on the Claude Platform, AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure under the model id claude-haiku-5-5.

Key Takeaways
  • This guide provides comprehensive, actionable information
  • Consider your specific workflow needs when evaluating options
  • Explore our curated LLMs tools for specific recommendations

What Anthropic released

On October 7, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, its new small model, on the Claude Platform, AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure under the model id claude-haiku-5-5. The headline is the price. For prompts up to 100,000 tokens it costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output, 90% less than Haiku 4.5 and exactly what OpenAI charges for GPT-6 Luna. It is also the first Haiku with adjustable effort levels, from low to max, and it can drive a computer or a browser through a beta in Anthropic's SDKs.

$0.10 / $0.50
per million input and output tokens, prompts up to 100K
90%
cheaper than Haiku 4.5 below the 100K line; 50% cheaper above it
~75%
average saving Anthropic expects across real Haiku traffic

The 100,000-token line is the whole pricing story

Haiku 5.5 has two prices. Under 100,000 tokens of prompt it is the cheapest Claude has ever been. Over it, every token costs five times as much: $0.50 in and $2.50 out. Anthropic says about 90% of Haiku 4.5 requests fall under the line, which is why it describes the average saving as "around 75%" rather than 90%.

Per million tokens Input Output Cache reads
Haiku 5.5, up to 100K $0.10 $0.50 $0.01
Haiku 5.5, over 100K $0.50 $2.50 $0.05
GPT-6 Luna $0.10 $0.50 See OpenAI
Haiku 4.5 $1.00 $5.00 $0.10
Sonnet 5.5 $2.00 $10.00 $0.10

Two smaller details change the real bill. Haiku 5.5 uses the newer tokenizer from Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5, which Anthropic says "uses slightly more tokens per task," so the same prompt counts as a little more than it did on Haiku 4.5. And on the same day Anthropic halved Sonnet 5.5's cache reads from $0.20 to $0.10 per million, which it estimates cuts the cost of a typical agentic task by about 20%.

How it compares with GPT-6 Luna

At the same price, the question is which model does more. On Anthropic's own table, Haiku 5.5 is ahead of Luna on every benchmark both were run on:

Benchmark Haiku 5.5 GPT-6 Luna Haiku 4.5
GDPval-AA v2.1 (knowledge work) 1620 1437 735
OSWorld 2.1 (computer use) 72.4% 48.9% 15.7%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (agentic coding) 39.2% 16.4% 0.0%
FrontierCode 1.1 46.4% 42.4% Not reported
Chartography (visual reasoning) 46.4% 29.1% 6.4%

Those are Anthropic's numbers, run by Anthropic. The independent check is the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, which as of October 8 scores Haiku 5.5 at 43.4 on max effort against 38.1 for GPT-6 Luna on max. The gap is smaller than Anthropic's tables suggest, but it runs the same way. Both sit well below Sonnet 5.5 at 56.0, which is what twenty times the input price buys. All three are on the leaderboard.

The biggest gaps are in computer use and agentic coding, the work small models were weakest at. On Terminal-Bench 4.0, Haiku 4.5 scored zero. That is the real change in this release: a small model that can now do agent work, not only fast answers.

What to watch

  • Long prompts. If your requests regularly cross 100,000 tokens, such as long documents or deep agent histories, you pay $0.50 and $2.50 per million, and the comparison with Luna changes. Trim context or cache it.
  • Security work. Anthropic has tightened Haiku 5.5's cybersecurity limits compared with Haiku 4.5. It allows a wider range of defensive tasks but blocks penetration testing. If that is your use, check before you migrate.
  • Refusals. According to Unite.AI's reading of the system card, Anthropic's automated audits found Haiku 5.5 over-refused more than any other model it tested, and Anthropic recommends developers add their own safeguards, especially with thinking turned off.
  • Effort settings. The default is medium. The index score above is max effort; at medium the same index puts it at 34.5. Pick the level per task rather than leaving the default everywhere.

Should you switch?

You run Haiku 4.5 today
Yes, after a test run. It is cheaper on almost every request and stronger on every benchmark Anthropic published. Recheck your token counts, because of the new tokenizer.
You run GPT-6 Luna
Test Haiku 5.5 on your own traffic. The price is the same, and it leads on Anthropic's tables and on the independent index. If your prompts are long, Luna may still be cheaper.
You use Sonnet 5.5 for sub-agents
Move the simple, high-volume steps to Haiku 5.5 and keep Sonnet for planning and hard steps. Sonnet's own cache reads just got cheaper too.
You need the best model, not the cheapest
This is not it. See Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5.

The listing is at Claude Haiku 5.5, alongside GPT-6 Luna and Haiku 4.5. For keeping agent bills under control, see AI agent cost control and the LLM pricing comparison. The launch is in the October 7 briefing.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What does Claude Haiku 5.5 cost, how does it compare with GPT-6 Luna and Haiku 4.5, and should you switch?
On October 7, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, its new small model, on the Claude Platform, AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure under the model id claude-haiku-5-5.
Which tool should I choose?
The best choice depends on your specific needs, priorities, and use case. This guide compares features, pricing, quality, speed, and workflow integration to help you make an informed decision based on what matters most to you.
What are the key differences between these tools?
Key differences typically include output quality, generation speed, pricing models, feature sets, and workflow integration. This guide provides detailed comparisons across all these dimensions to highlight what makes each tool unique.
Can I use multiple tools together?
Yes, many professionals use multiple tools in their workflow, leveraging each tool's strengths for different tasks. This guide helps you understand when to use which tool and how they can complement each other.
EXPLORE TOOLS

Ready to try AI tools? Explore our curated directory:

SHARE THIS GUIDE

On October 7, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, its new small model, on the Claude Platform, AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure under the model id claude-haiku-5-5.

Share on X LinkedIn Reddit Email
Copied to clipboard